Identity Fragmentation & Sovereignity: Therapy Intensive: Neurodivergence, Selfhood, and Reclaiming Self Embodiment
Identity Fragmentation & Sovereignty Intensive: Neurodivergence, Selfhood & Coming Back to Yourself
What happens when you have spent so long adapting to different environments, relationships, expectations, and systems that you no longer know which parts of you are actually yours? What happens when you have spent so long adapting that you no longer know which version of you is actually you? For many neurodivergent people, there may be the version of you at work, the version with your family, the version with friends, the version with your partner, the version you present socially, the version you become in different relational environments, and the version that exists when you are alone, when nobody is watching, or underneath all of those adaptations. For many neurodivergent people who have spent years masking, camouflaging, monitoring themselves, and adapting to different environments, identity can become distributed across contexts. You may have become extraordinarily skilled at reading environments and adjusting yourself accordingly, extraordinarily good at becoming what the environment requires, able to tell what version of yourself will be easiest for a particular person to tolerate. You may have spent so much time being legible to other people that you have lost contact with your own internal authority, spent so much time organizing yourself around other people's expectations, interpretations, needs, or definitions of you that you no longer know who you are when you are not doing so. Eventually, you may begin asking: Who am I when I am not adapting? Who are you when you are no longer organizing yourself around other people's interpretations of you?
​
This can create identity fragmentation—not necessarily meaning having entirely separate selves, nor necessarily being used as a psychiatric construct, but rather referring to the experience of having your sense of self divided or distributed across different roles, adaptations, expectations, relational and social environments, and contexts. It can mean experiencing yourself as distributed across the self you are at work, the self you are with family, the self you perform socially, the self that emerges with friends or a partner, the self that exists when you are alone, and the self that exists underneath all of those adaptations. The experience can be one of having different versions of yourself emerge in different contexts in order to maintain belonging, safety, approval, stability, connection, or legibility. This intensive explores the question of who you are when you are no longer organizing yourself around other people's expectations, interpretations, needs, or definitions of you, examining identity fragmentation across different relational and social environments, masking and camouflaging, context-dependent identities and selves, internalized expectations about who you are supposed to be, conflicting internalized voices and identities, repeated experiences of misrecognition, the impact of being defined by other people's perceptions, the difference between adaptation and authentic self-expression, the experience of becoming different versions of yourself to maintain belonging, safety, approval, or stability, what happens when your own internal knowing conflicts with how others perceive or define you, and disowned, suppressed, or underdeveloped aspects of self.
The central questions become: Who are you when you are no longer organizing yourself around other people's interpretations of you? Who are you when you are no longer trying to be legible to someone else? What happens when your own internal knowing conflicts with how other people perceive or define you? What happens when the person you know yourself to be does not match the person other people have decided you are? The goal is not to discover one perfectly fixed, essential, or untouched identity and hold onto it forever, nor is it to discover one fixed, essential identity and require yourself to become or remain that singular version of yourself. Rather, the goal is to develop a more coherent sense of self without requiring yourself to become rigid or singular. The goal is sovereignty.
​
Sovereignty does not mean isolation, does not mean refusing influence from anyone, and does not mean believing that every internal impulse must be acted upon. Sovereignty means developing the capacity to recognize yourself as an authority on your own internal experience, developing an increasingly stable relationship with your own internal authority, becoming increasingly able to recognize, trust, and consult your own perception, values, needs, desires, and internal knowing, and making choices from an internally anchored sense of self rather than perpetual adaptation to external demands. It means developing the capacity to ask: What do I actually want? What do I actually believe? What is mine? What is mine—and what have I inherited, absorbed, performed, or been assigned? And ultimately: Who am I when I am not trying to be legible to someone else? And: What would it mean to belong to yourself?
​
The work is not about finding a single version of yourself and rejecting every other version. It is about developing enough internal authority to recognize yourself across contexts while allowing yourself to remain complex, contextual, relational, and capable of change. It is about coming back to yourself without demanding that yourself become rigid. And ultimately, it is about developing a relationship with yourself in which you no longer have to continually become what the environment requires in order to know that you belong. What would it mean to belong to yourself?